I think "6 for 4" would be bad from an equity standpoint

I think "6 for 4" would be bad from an equity standpoint
by NavyJoe (2020-07-10 12:18:39)
Edited on 2020-07-10 12:18:53

In reply to: I read it all. I didn't say anything about extra kids posted by gregmorrissey

I'm quite torn on this because I recognize that the athletes are really getting screwed over in this situation, but allowing an extra year would tremendously imbalance the competitive landscape in all sports; well-heeled schools (such as Notre Dame) would be able to afford the cost while smaller schools and many state schools likely would / could not.

It also basically mocks the educational aspect of this. 99% of people should not be in college for six years.

Replies:

look, here's the thing that is seemingly getting overlooked - jt 2020-07-10 13:16:40
- Agree completely with your points - gregmorrissey 2020-07-10 14:05:48
  - "competition sucks" - jt 2020-07-10 14:10:12
    - Feel free to suggest an alternative solution - gregmorrissey 2020-07-10 14:46:58
      - I cannot promote a legitimate alternative solution - jt 2020-07-10 15:02:48
        In my plan, the numbers DO NOT CHANGE! - gregmorrissey 2020-07-10 16:36:33
        smh - jt 2020-07-10 18:09:16
        Honestly, i don't know why I'm still responding - gregmorrissey 2020-07-10 19:49:54
        you don't understand so many things - jt 2020-07-11 15:25:20
        You can't be this obtuse - gregmorrissey 2020-07-11 18:23:05
        you purposefully avoid the biggest single factor? - jt 2020-07-11 23:16:08
Is it ok or not ok for a student to be in school for 6 years - BIG MAC 2020-07-10 12:36:23
- Of course that's ok... - NavyJoe 2020-07-10 12:46:39
There is no extra cost - gregmorrissey 2020-07-10 12:31:59
- there are no good options - jt 2020-07-10 13:18:56
- I don't have data, but I believe ND is an exception * - NavyJoe 2020-07-10 12:48:06