Pre Spring Hopium
by SEE (2024-03-06 20:27:02)

RB - Good, could be great
QB - Pretty good to good
WR - Pretty good to good
TE - Good, could be great
OT - Hope
OG - Hope
C- Good, will be great one day

DE - Good, could be great
DT - Very goodly
LB - Should be good (Kiser is the new Bertrand)
CB - Very good to great
S - Very good to great

People seem to like Mitchell at WR
The Minch has gotten good reviews from many outlets
Price is good

Synthesis of reports.







OL is certainly the biggest concern.
by 84david  (2024-03-07 09:20:03)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

The reconstituted line in the sun bowl (albeit against a lot of scrubs) pushed the opponent around like rag dolls. So there is a glimmer of hope that the OL will turn out to be decent.

I'll withhold judgement until after A&M, of course.


Baker and Coogan
by SEE  (2024-03-07 16:38:06)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Seem to be the biggest concerns.

There’s a lot of faith that Jagusah and Shrauth will get there.


Cougar and Merlin *
by hansgruber  (2024-03-07 17:26:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Seals and Crofts *
by jt  (2024-03-07 17:29:24)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Siegfried and Roy *
by drmurray  (2024-03-08 06:56:26)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Roy Rogers & Dale Evans
by SWPaDem  (2024-03-08 07:46:24)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

(not to mention Trigger)


Rabinowitz Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz. *
by usmcirish  (2024-03-09 16:13:45)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Those two on the OL would blaze Happy Trails for the RBs. *
by arasera  (2024-03-09 00:10:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Concern Nu 1, you might say. *
by 105Marquette  (2024-03-07 14:43:41)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Pernicious is a decent alternative *
by enginerd194  (2024-03-07 08:59:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Tony Riccio? *
by Patrick Bateman  (2024-03-07 08:47:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Why do I recognize that name? *
by DawsonMayes871  (2024-03-07 16:19:48)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


A former listener of Power Hour? *
by SavageDragon  (2024-03-08 08:10:42)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Even for hopium, you're way too optimistic about WR and TE *
by Tex Francisco  (2024-03-07 08:27:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


WR should be fine
by Ty Webb  (2024-03-07 12:01:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Greathouse and Thomas and Faison from last year. Now add in the transfers from this past winter.

They aren't going to be trotting out a WR group like we've seen from Alabama or LSU or OSU in recent years but compared to some of our groups over the last few years, it should be better.


We haven't had a plus-level receiving group in
by KeoughCharles05  (2024-03-07 13:35:17)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

quite a while. Last year's group was catastrophically bad, and the year before was pretty awful too (though harder to assess given the limitations at QB).

Here's our leading WR's receptions and yards the past several years:
23: Flores 27-392
22: Styles 30-340
21: Austin 48-888
20: McKinley 42-717
19: Claypool 66-1037
18: Boykin 59-872
17: St.Brown 33-515
16: St.Brown 58-961
15: Fuller 62-1258

The post-Claypool years have been pretty uninspiring. Even Kevin Austin's final year was highly inconsistent with plenty of key drops.

Maybe it happens this year. But I think we need to see it first.


About TE? I think he's undervaluing
by TheRC  (2024-03-07 10:22:45)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Even sans Mitchell

Raridon
Flanagan
Sherwood
Bauman
Larsen
Garrity

I would feel very confident in a TE group consisting of just Raridon, Flanagan, Sherwood, and Bauman. I'd expect 4+ receptions per game which would be Top 10 caliber. I'd expect all 4 of those guys to be Average to Above Average Blockers with respect to the TE position. Raridon and Flanagan may not be the caliber of player that requires special game-planning like Mayer or Bowers but that type of potential isn't out of the realm of possibility IMO.


Baumen is out for spring.
by rkellyatrecess  (2024-03-07 10:59:10)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

And seems like a logical subtraction as a grad transfer to get the scholarship number under 85.


New injury or still rehabbing from August? Feel so bad for
by NJIrish04  (2024-03-07 14:02:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

the kid. His injury history (broken leg in opener against FSU in '21, 2 ACL tears since then) really held him back during his career.