This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
We haven't had a plus-level receiving group in by KeoughCharles05
quite a while. Last year's group was catastrophically bad, and the year before was pretty awful too (though harder to assess given the limitations at QB).
Here's our leading WR's receptions and yards the past several years:
23: Flores 27-392
22: Styles 30-340
21: Austin 48-888
20: McKinley 42-717
19: Claypool 66-1037
18: Boykin 59-872
17: St.Brown 33-515
16: St.Brown 58-961
15: Fuller 62-1258
The post-Claypool years have been pretty uninspiring. Even Kevin Austin's final year was highly inconsistent with plenty of key drops.
Maybe it happens this year. But I think we need to see it first.