Clemson? Pretty sure they did. Swinney probably not

Clemson? Pretty sure they did. Swinney probably not
by DakotaDomer (2018-12-28 13:09:26)

In reply to: I doubt very much Clemson had anything to do with it. posted by Papa November

One sixth of their tested players with very little mutual connection tested positive for the same banned substance.

I’d imagine Clemson’s training, weight lifting, or medical staff were the point of crossover and not some shady supplement salesperson who managed to infiltrate the Clemson football team without the coaches ever knowing.

Replies:

Not calling you out here but - Catdog2 2018-12-29 01:16:37
- People here were outraged by "Zero. None. Absolutely none." - IrishJosh24 2018-12-29 09:18:10
  - Pretty sure the quote was said by Kelly, not Swarbrick - Catdog2 2018-12-29 11:56:03
    - I'm aware it was Kelly. - IrishJosh24 2018-12-29 19:11:32
How are you "pretty sure?" - Papa November 2018-12-28 14:12:36
- I would guess the most likely scenario - Catdog2 2018-12-29 01:20:57
- If anything I question "Swinney probably not" * - Tubes 2018-12-28 20:59:01
- Sounds about right to me. * - beattherush 2018-12-28 17:27:43
- So the defense is “established ignorance” - DakotaDomer 2018-12-28 15:02:36
  - I've lost track of what you're talking about. - Papa November 2018-12-28 17:45:26
    - How did it go from pretty sure to sure? - DakotaDomer 2018-12-28 18:35:32
How many were tested? * - G.K.Chesterton 2018-12-28 13:39:05