One solution, very unpalatable for long term fans,...
by Kbyrnes (2024-02-24 12:01:59)

In reply to: I don't know what the endgame is here?  posted by El Kabong


...would be to unlink the varsity football programs from the schools, and instead, have teams that are still called the UT Volunteers, Alabama Crimson Tide, or ND Fighting Irish, but rather than being entities directly owned and controlled by the school, they would become independently incorporated entities that license the brand names from the respective institutions.

The athletes playing for these newly-incorporated entities might still largely be students of the licensor institutions but could not be considered employees of those institutions; they would work for, and have contracts with, the newly incorporated teams. These new entities could form a league or leagues that then feed the NFL without the historical obstacles or processes characteristic of NCAA days--no draft day, etc.; the pro teams would just hire whoever they can (in line, of course, with their own agreements with the pro players' unions, etc.)

Football would continue as owned and operated entities of places like UT, Alabama, and ND as club sports with no scholarships...sort of a glorified interhall status, maybe.


Hey you guys are catching up!
by airborneirish  (2024-02-26 12:58:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Remember when I said “this will inevitably lead to the Harvard patriots” and really deep thinkers called me crazy?

Guess what? They’re wrong and I’m right. As usual.


I've been saying this for years...
by Kbyrnes  (2024-02-27 19:17:22)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...As you recall, my grad school alma mater is famous in college football circles for abandoning the varsity/scholarship model in 1939. One of my favorite SI articles is the one by Hutchins in 1951 where he laid all that was wrong with college football out for all to see.


I’m serious. The top 25 schools do not have these revenue
by airborneirish  (2024-02-27 20:45:12)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Streams. This shit is already in UBIT territory (unrelated business income tax).

The second whatever you proposed happens it will behoove the ivys to say “hold my Cabernet” and start buying pro teams. There will also be litigation. This is the most dimwitted meat headed way to go and it’s sad there are intelligent posters on here who can’t see further than this step in the downfall of college football.


I would prefer that ND take the off ramp
by ACross  (2024-02-26 20:24:23)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Call it, for instance, the NCAA. Let the revenue addicts and southern rednecks take their ball and play elsewhere.


everyone will be taking the off ramp soon enough
by jt  (2024-02-27 20:45:20)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

it's just a matter of where the exit leads.


We won’t and it’s a shame. Our die was cast with crossroads *
by airborneirish  (2024-02-26 21:09:43)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


i think it depends
by crazychester  (2024-02-27 22:01:51)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

on what the bifurcation looks like.

Its not like Nd borrowed to build crossroads. They are in the middle of a $10B capital campaign. They'd be entirely fine without big money college football.


but would they be fine with being "entirely fine?"
by jt  (2024-02-28 12:43:57)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I don't know.

You're probably right in that it depends on the circumstances, but I can pretty much see ways to justify just about anything.

"When your values are clear, your decisions are easy." Roy Disney


I think lots of people have worried about that possibility. *
by VaDblDmr  (2024-02-26 13:16:51)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I don't get this angle. Why would fans care?
by ndzippy  (2024-02-26 12:45:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Why would anybody associated with ND care about a team--consisting entirely of non-students (because that's what will happen)--that wears its logo via a licensing agreement with the school?

If ND licensed its logo to a minor-league baseball team (or even a major league team), I would have no more interest in that squad than a team like the South Bend Silverhawks or Chicago Cubs.

The "shared experience" we have with the student-athletes wearing ND uniforms is a hell of a lot more important to most fans than a "shared logo" will ever be.


Just food for thought, but
by smithwick  (2024-02-26 14:12:43)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

presumably ND would still be able to recruit athletes that would find the benefit of pursuing a ND degree. Let's say 30-50% of the team still wants to work towards a degree.

For the others, wouldn't ND still continue to recruit high-character kids who value the school, its mission, and its values? Marcus Freeman has no connection to the school other than getting paid a hefty sum to coach it. Yet, it's obvious he completely embodies the spirit of the school and its mission. Would there not be a number of 18-22 year olds who may not wish (or cannot) pursue a degree, but would still be fine representatives of the University and you could cheer for?

I am not taking a position either way, but just throwing this out there.


Reasonable minds can disagree, but I'd still be 100% out
by ndzippy  (2024-02-26 15:08:48)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

College athletics is for college students, period.

When that connection is severed--even if by "just" 50% of the players on the roster--so is my interest in it.

There is a long list of things ND currently licenses its trademarks for that I have zero interest in: Citizen watches, Dooney & Bourke wallets, Tervis tumblers, Zipchair gaming chairs, Marble Canyon duffel bags, chrome pub tables, billiard lights, letter openers, paperweights, etc. A licensed "college football" team would immediately land on that list.


This is exactly where we're headed
by exit77  (2024-02-26 12:35:05)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Schools will license these new entities the name and branding, and use of facilities. One huge licensing payment will be made to the university, which will fund all other sports.


I've got about half the NFL between me and South Bend and
by Carlos Huerta  (2024-02-24 19:42:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

no real interest in going to any of them. This would be an inferior product that I feel no connection to. Not going to and not going out of my way to watch it.


That would be a mess *
by Groundhog  (2024-02-24 18:19:10)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


That would be the death of college football.
by The Beef  (2024-02-24 15:57:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I doubt ND would compete at that level. If they did, they’d do it without this lifelong fan and third-generation alum.


it's already dead....totally unrecognizable any more *
by kdh325  (2024-02-24 16:20:02)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


That's about where I am.
by doolinbanjos  (2024-02-24 16:38:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Some long-ago programmed synapses will let me root for the guys in the gold helmets on Saturdays in the fall, but I likely won't follow much of what else is going on in college football.


I don’t understand how all these different sports/leagues
by IAND75  (2024-02-24 12:50:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

work, but could they transition to models similar to baseball or hockey? At least for the sports where there could be a significant pro minor league option?


I believe that would kill the sport. It's inferior pro
by VaDblDmr  (2024-02-24 12:09:58)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

football, which historically hasn't flourished.


It's been inferior pro football in the SEC for a while now.
by smithwick  (2024-02-26 14:00:36)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

College football is not going away for many just because the payments are now over the table.


Bingo *
by KeoughCharles05  (2024-02-25 22:15:21)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post