This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

"That's nice" but they've seen Clark coming for 2 years or by Anotherjoe

More and expansion is going to take four more years! During that time interval half of more of the draft picks and even some #1s (Charli Collier) will be cut and go elsewhere.

My opinion WNBA is too slow.

Second, last year most games were televised but mostly on subscription channels like Apple, Max, HBO, etc. Very seldom were they on more accessible channels like ESPN CBS etc.

If they want to build a big fan base and take advantage of the Clark effect get the games on main stream tv. Don't hide them and shot yourself in the foot.

I obviously have concerns with WNBA management. They have an opportunity now don't blow it.