This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Should The Coaches Stay or Should They Go? by dillon77
To AAU Events, that is.
Raoul raises an exisential question for college coaches and staff:
"This weekend, April 19-21, is an evaluation period on the D-I WBB recruiting calendar. Will coaches be on the road recruiting high school prospects or stay on campus hosting transfer portal targets?"
Druthers: If memory holds, ND usually splits its coaches up and sends them various AAU events. If there is a portal prospect who is interested, hot in the market and has an interest in the Dome, I'd split the difference: Keep Niele and the appropriate position coach on campus and send the others to the AAU events. (That said, Carlos Knox can only recruit on campus so he's a good guy to always have around.)
Any other thoughts?