This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Focus on why #8 is true. by AFA91
The top coaches can sense that the institution is not truly committed to winning in football. They can sense that this institution's leadership can't handle the truth of what it takes to win in a game like football. Sure, they'll throw money at the problem all the live-long day, but they are so deathly afraid of anything that might tarnish ND's pristine image, that a real football coach is simply out of the question.
If leadership had the right mentality, the nation's best coaches would immediately sense it, and they would fight over each other to coach here. As it is, they would not consider taking this job, with all of its dress-wearing prerequisites.
That post was a magnificent masterpiece, BTW.