This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Kelly's legacy as a coach: Cincy was better without him. by NDMike2001
Kelly left Cincinnati in search of more money and a national title. In his 12th and final season it was Kelly who gave Cincinnati the shot at a national championship by losing to them - at home - giving them their only signature win. Ironically, the only quality opponent on Notre Dame's schedule as well. The fear was always that Kelly would turn Notre Dame into Cincinnati. Hell, he couldn't even do that.
I don't hate Brian Kelly. I hate that our administration was pleased with him as the leader of our program. I think it's going to be Freeman. It's a big risk for sure. But I've seen nothing from Freeman that leads me to believe that I would be ashamed to have him as our coach. Quite the contrary.