This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Huh? by Freight Train
My point was they haven’t had a bad coach in 70 years. In that time, we’ve had Hanratty, Kuharich, Faust, Davis, Ty and Weis.
I would have much rather had OSU’s last 70 years than ours. We’ve had six horrible coaches to endure. They’ve had zero.
Are you saying they should have won more titles during that span? I would agree with that but if you’re asking me whether I’d have preferred OSU’s “underperformance” over the last 70 years versus ours, I’ll take theirs in a heartbeat. We’ve had 6 horrible coaches over 28 years. They have had zero.