This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

We'd be a few spots higher with more convincing wins by garbageplate

But I still think our schedule would be a hindrance at the end of the season when it's time to pick teams. Besides, if we were talented enough to be a top 4 or 5 team, we wouldn't need to be propped up by a weak schedule.

The ACC part of the schedule is just a bunch of no-win games. We get little credit for winning them and we lose credibility by playing those games close.

I'd rather play a better schedule and have our true standing laid bare. Of course, it benefits Kelly and Swarbrick to go 11-1 against a soft schedule than to challenge themselves than to challenge themselves in a manner consistent with their predecessors.