This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
The game plan was awful by fontoknow
on both sides of ball.
And I don't think Kelly's ever had a game plan for special teams.
I'm still very concerned about the efforts of the ACC crew to affect the outcome of the game.
The miss spot of the 4th down play in the 1st half. The failure to call roughing the punter in the 4th quarter. And the botched review where the fumble in OT was ruled an incomplete pass instead of either a fumble or intentional grounding were all game changing (or potentially game changing). We deserver far better.