This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

That stat should be Question #1 in next press conference by StetsonDan

That stat is damning both in Kelly/Alexander's inability to recruit top level receiving talent and to utilize any wide receivers until they're upperclassmen.

I limited my numbers to the past 4 years because I had to pick some sort of arbitrary cutoff, that lines up with Kelly 2.0 [or whatever version], and the game seems like's it's tilted even more towards offense since Saban has embraced the spread.

You're right that listing Jones/Robinson/Stepherson's stats cuts against my argument that you need to have legit NFL talent to contribute as a true freshman, but I think those may be off for a few reasons. First, all three had their freshman season in a season that could be considered the bottom half of Kelly's career at ND (Jones: 8-5 in '10; Robinson: 9-4 in '13; and Stepherson: 4-8 in '16).

In looking at those three, Robinson was probably the most prepared from a "traits" standpoint of any player in the Kelly era which explains why he was able to step in and play right away. As far as Stepherson, it's hard to look past his knuckleheadedness, but the coaches raved about his talent (see this tweet from Pete Sampson)

A former Notre Dame assistant once told me Stepherson was the second-best player he’d ever coached. After Quenton Nelson. https://t.co/2oDFQFRcSp

— Pete Sampson (@PeteSampson_) February 9, 2021