This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I'd argue the real reason is the opposite of Jvan's joke. by IrishJosh24

We don't get traction with many top-100 recruits because they are not idiots. They know exactly what they'll get from places like OSU, Clemson, and Bama - multiple chances to win a title and a pathway to the NFL. And they know exactly what they'll get from ND - one or two chances to be embarrassed in a meaningful bowl and a possible path, largely depending on position (WR, TE, OL, yes; QB, no) to the NFL.

Based on our results and Kelly's leadership, we basically have to hope that the best football players in the country come to our school for non-football reasons. Maybe it would be more accurate to say that we hope to hope the best football players in the country value their educations and post-grad networks more than they value their football futures. Occasionally, that works out, and it's great. It's true that a Notre Dame player (1) will graduate, (2) with a meaningful degree, and (3) will leave with a national network of potential employers if football doesn't work out. OSU, Clemson, and Bama aren't competing on that front. Their players are less likely to graduate, more likely to have less meaningful degrees, and will, at best, have strong regional networks post-graduation.

But the top-100 guys are likely thinking about college as a springboard to the NFL. I'm not saying we shouldn't sell what makes us unique. We should. It adds a ton of value. But we have to be able to sell some football success too. Not just a 10-win season, but a big bowl win, a real chance to be the best.

Right now, we can't. So it's really hard to convince a top-100 player that his best shot at a title or the NFL is Notre Dame. It's especially hard when the coach doesn't think his time is best spent making that pitch.