This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Kelly has shown he isn’t good enough to have ND dominate CFB by Father Nieuwland
I think most if us agree with that.
Some will say this is as good as ND can be. I don’t buy that any more than I bought it when people made that claim while Davie, Willingham and Weis were the coaches.
I think it is as good as Kelly can be, but ND can be better.
People can make fun of Texas for firing Herman (or going way back, Nebraska fir firing Solich). But at least they are trying to be great. I’m more embarrassed that ND is settling for “good enough” rather than trying to achieve greatness.