This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Probably so. On the other hand, if you can by Jaxdulac

tolerate that aspect without repeatedly throwing up in your mouth, college gives you the potential to have all 25 of the first 25 picks in the draft. All figuratively speaking, of course, but recruiting doesn't relegate you and the other programs to one pick each in a round robin format. You can be greedy. The talent disparity among NFL teams isn't all that great, top to bottom. In college, if you're at an elite program and prove yourself an elite recruiter, you could have demonstrably more talent than all but 5 or 6 other programs.