This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
really might be concerned at the level of 10 paying students by turtle17
Might be penny wise and pound foolish, but it is within possibility that universities care about having 10 non-paying students instead of paying ones. And it might be the case they really are aiming to fill everything up they can next fall to stabilize their bottom lines. I'm pretty confident our local U will aim to have every dorm spot absolutely filled next year if public health allows it at all, and every seat in big courses filled, etc. Compared to everything else the football team both costs and brings in, having ten fewer scholarships might not be the best way to save money, but it might also be one of their few options.