This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

What’s your better solution for a 2020 schedule? by fortune_smith

Without games against the B1G, Pac 12 and the ACC with the first two going conference-only and the ACC going 10+1 with the +1 required to be played in-state.

Home-and-home with BYU and Army? Preserve some of the Navy, Arkansas and WMU games — maybe even all, though this may be beyond our control? Maybe some road games in the ACC’s +1 slot? Maybe some games versus the Big 12 and additional SEC opponents to the extent they allow non-conference games and we fit into their constructs?

Can you get to 10 games? Will half be at home? Will the P5 opponents be available for us on the weekends that we need given that they’re all playing 10 conference games and only 10 or 11 total?

Against the constraints that have emerged, this is an excellent outcome. And it’s clearly set up to be a single-season outcome. it also aligns with the university’s obligation to deliver a reasonable solution to our student-athletes.

Now, hopefully, we can prudently proceed with a season, though, obviously, this still seems very much up in the air.