In reply to: Is that valid? I'm always confused on whistles and restarts posted by spade
An opponent stops to help the cramping player. To take advantage of that by playing with an injured (only cramping) player is pathetic
Why? The injured player was still on the ground. The ball was not in play. The referee should have indicated a ceremonial restart and asked for attention for the injured player. This wasn't bang-bang - there was quite a bit of time between the whistle and the restart.
On a side note, I didn't keep watching but I assume the 'injured' player was just fine.
You don't even get a warning for preventing a quick free kick by standing in front of the ball. It's an immediate caution and then a hard restart. I actually did this to a kid a couple weeks ago.
'But he didn't ask for ten!' Doesn't need to, buddy.