You make a good point, but we are really the norm, not the
by sprack (2014-12-05 17:04:12)
Edited on 2014-12-05 17:27:00
[ Delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Rock's House ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

  In reply to: Faust, Davie, TW, and CW are all obvious disadvantages...  posted by Scoop80

exception on that.

Every historically elite program has had the same situation where they've had 3, maybe 4 truly great coaches in their history and the rest have either been dogs (often multiples in a row) or have been very good but never got to great, often because they just couldn't win the Big Game (John Cooper comes to mind as the poster boy). That they've had 3 or 4 is often why they got to elite in the first place. (Incidentally, there are a few programs who have really only had 1 truly great coach, and/or one or two who stayed for a very long time). If anyone can name a program with as many as 5, please do.

There are a lot of bad coaches and a lot of very good coaches, but there just plain aren't many truly great coaches out there, and there never has been.

And a truly great coach, assuming proper administrative support, can make almost any team great. A stark example is Bill Snyder at K-State. Before him they were terrible, when he left they were better but slipped back to the pack and almost to mediocrity, and when they got him back they became a national contender again.

Just pointing it out not as an excuse having anything to do with our present situation or Bruno95's very worthy question which I think he answered very well himself, but just what is historic reality for just about all programs.


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. is not responsible for its contents.