In reply to: Cincinnati posted by wearendhockey
they play Georgia, Ohio State, or probably Alabama. Their win over us makes them look better than they really are.
I'm in the camp that there are two or three elite teams and then a bunch of lessers fighting for fourth, which includes us.
I don’t see how one could argue they weren’t a worthy champion.
If Cincy goes undefeated and then beats Ohio State and Georgia, seems a bit silly to say that they were undeserving because of their regular season schedule. Particularly, as OSU has a loss already, and Georgia hasn't really played a meatgrinder schedule.
From this point of view, why play the games. Just pick which team has the most NFL prospects or highest ranked recruits.
You've just made the argument for dumbing down regular season schedules everywhere.
Other than ND, Cincinnati has played no one in the top 40, two teams in the top 80 (SMU 44th, UCF 59th). Five of their opponents are ranked lower than 100.
No, I do not think they've proven on the field sufficiently to get a chance to prove it on the field in a playoff.
It really isn’t their fault that they play in a second tier conference. A dumbed down schedule is not advantageous for anyone as it removes all margin for error.
Crazy to me that if Cincy was able to manage to beat the 2 best teams that they wouldn’t be considered a worthy champ.
If you don’t like the teams with the most nfl prospects winning despite 2-3 losses before then, just wait till Alabama, Georgia, and Ohio Starw make the 12 team playoff every. Single. Year. Hell in a twelve team playoff Clemson would still have a shot. Even though they’ve proven “on the field” they shouldn’t.