In reply to: Sure- that's true posted by garbageplate
But I still think our schedule would be a hindrance at the end of the season when it's time to pick teams. Besides, if we were talented enough to be a top 4 or 5 team, we wouldn't need to be propped up by a weak schedule.
The ACC part of the schedule is just a bunch of no-win games. We get little credit for winning them and we lose credibility by playing those games close.
I'd rather play a better schedule and have our true standing laid bare. Of course, it benefits Kelly and Swarbrick to go 11-1 against a soft schedule than to challenge themselves than to challenge themselves in a manner consistent with their predecessors.
It’s apparent that the CFP does not want a group of 5 so our ceiling is one spot behind Cincinnati and out of the playoffs. Had we lost to Wisconsin (who’d be 6-2 and likely finish 10-3) and then beat Cincinnati, we’d be in much better shape. Agree that we also would have benefited from not having 3 mail biters against garbage teams.
It doesn’t really matter. The only question is whether the talent on Bama and OSU gels fast enough to challenge UGA. No one else really has a shot.