In reply to: it was the wrong decision posted by jt
And I think concerns about the opinions of Aspirational Peer Universities impacted the decision (as well as the core issue of discovery of academic fraud within a University).
Plus, if people at ND felt he lied to them or knowingly dis not reveal the truth to them, it would have been tough to keep a new employee.
I would have looked for a way to keep him (some sort of penance like finish the number of credits he needed to get that masters degree), but I can understand ND choosing to cut bait while still disagreeing with that conclusion.