No Cheating, 3 question Quiz re: Kelly's red zone offence
by ColoraDomer (2017-08-11 10:53:36)
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Rock's House ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

 


Off of the top of your head, without google. Link has the answers.

a) How many times has Kelly's offense finished in the top 20 in red zone offense;

b) How many times has Kelly's offense finished in the top 25 in red zone offense;

c) How many times has Kelly's offense finished in the top 50 in red zone offense;

Answer a) # times; b) # times; c) # times



I don't know for sure, but of one thing I am certain.
by Bacchus  (2017-08-11 13:24:17)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

The answer to those questions can be expressed as a binary number.


0,0,0 *
by discNDav  (2017-08-11 13:17:04)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


irrelevant. progress is gauged between the 20's. *
by NDWahoo  (2017-08-11 13:12:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Swarbrick only takes bribes in $100s and $50s. *
by 88_92WSND  (2017-08-11 19:55:06)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Year 8 of installation of the Red Zone Corner Fade package
by LateNiteNaugles  (2017-08-11 11:47:08)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Is going to make all the difference and launch us into the Top 60. Just you watch...


It's a complicated set of packages that take time
by ballb4all  (2017-08-11 13:15:52)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

for the kids to understand. Year 8 is when the second rotation of the RKGs are at the end of their tenure and the various packages are finally starting to settle in for these guys. This year, the hope is to have only 3 or 4 penalties for too many players on the field in crucial situations. If that is accomplished, it is a win-win for everyone.


Zero. None. Absolutely none. *
by coalcracker  (2017-08-11 11:23:39)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


seconded *
by ThreeD  (2017-08-11 12:11:28)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


0, 0, 0 *
by dwjm3  (2017-08-11 11:11:56)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


For clarification
by BigCLumber  (2017-08-11 11:11:38)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Does question C mean to read as written? Or do you mean to ask how many times has Kelly finished from 26-50? In other words, If I think that Kelly has finished inside the top 25 once, but outside the top 50 every other year, would I answer 0,1,1? Or 0,1,0?


I'm assuming it reads as written and answering 0,1,1
by BigCLumber  (2017-08-11 11:27:25)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I seem to remember the 2012 offense being halfway decent in terms of red zone efficiency and scoring at a pretty high clip inside the 20. I don't think any other Kelly offense has finished inside the top 50.


0, 0, 0 *
by Clarence Beeks  (2017-08-11 11:08:55)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


0,0,0 *
by domer86  (2017-08-11 11:05:31)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


0, 0, 1
by Jwill77  (2017-08-11 10:59:47)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

My recall of previous seasons may be tainted by disappointment.


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.