Kelly should be considered the ultimate contrarian indicator
by irishrock (2017-04-14 08:48:32)
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Rock's House ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

  In reply to: it's a good thing we've got you here to set us straight  posted by jt

A Stanford HC Bill Walsh saying negative things about his QB (can't see that happening by the way) would raise suspicions with NFL GM's and coaches. Or good things.

With BK, you'd think people would "consider the source" and take the opposite side of the bet

As far as my opinion, when I read analysts say that, at his best, Kizer is the best QB. It's the "at his worse" analysis that is spooky. I believe Kizer's NFL development will be dependent on his coach and team situation. If he can get the right coach and a solid franchise, he's got a real shot at being a very good NFL QB. If he were to land in Jacksonville, he's likely toast


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. is not responsible for its contents.