This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Probably wave of the future by SixShutouts66

With the expansion of the number of teams in the tournament and stadium requirements, it seems that a very limited number of countries can now host the tournament - even more limited than before. I'd guess that some of the "minnow" nations see hope to be part of a multi-nation bid in the future. The positive to the three-nation bid, as pointed out in the Loretta Lynch post, is that some FIFA old hands may still be angry with the corruption probe and might want to punish the US for leading it - so a multi-nation bid is more palatable (guess).