This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Correct on both counts by wcnitz
Was Sane offside on the first goal? Possibly, but no camera angle shows the angle that the AR had on the touchline. And if there is ANY doubt, the flag should not be raised. Period. His arm was clearly off, but that isn't relevant. Was his foot? That is questionable at best.
The second could be argued as offside in lower levels of soccer if the keeper was clearly distracted by the player lunging at the ball, but at that level, no. His line of sight was not blocked and while an attempt was made to play the ball, it does not necessarily indicate an impact on the run of play.