Post Reply to Political

This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

Message:

HTTP Link (optional):

Poster's Email (optional):

 


Post being replied to

HTownND made a solid point years ago. by EricCartman

He said that the employer based model removes the incentive for insurance companies to care about their patients over the long-term because people will roll off of their plan at some point (and onto Mcare).

The hesitancy to pay for weight-loss drugs highlights this issue. Why pay a lot now to limit future medical problems?

I will say that I have been on the other side of this. At my old job, we used to treat a lot of Hep-C patients. The treatments were very expensive, but effective. The issue was that these guys would go back out and use needles to inject drugs and catch Hep-C again. Then, we would pay to treat them again. So I can kind of relate on some level with both parties here.

I will say that breaking the employer based model should be a political goal for both parties. I'm on the ACA exchange and it is pretty easy to use. The plans are expensive, but that is because I pay full boat. It would be different under a different design.