This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
A slight twist on recruiting a forward. The idea of going by MountainMan
after a solid rebounder with the added asset of being a capable scorer as well. (King from Pitt.for example.). The twist being the consideration of going one in and four out, which opens up the door for more playing time for that type of player. It also would give the team a lot of versatility.
I believe we do need another big, to share time with Kate. 6'3" - 6'6" range. Fulfilling both those needs would still only give us nine players.
The tenth player might just be the best athlete left, out there, that would be a good fit for the team. (All this assumes that Maddy is returning.)