This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Dunno 'Bout That, Joe: 6'5" Clara Strack Showed a Lot by dillon77
...against Baylor: 18 pts (on 6-8 shooting) and 10 rebounds.
She's tall, has mobility and has three years left.
The only "non-fit" with the Irish is that another 6'5" post is arriving this June in the form of Kate Koval.
Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if Brooks tries to see if he could get Strack to go to Lexington, unless he arranged with Va. Tech not to touch the players.
Agree with you, otherwise. I thought 6'2" forward Rose Micheaux would have a greater impact for them when she came over Minnesota; perhaps taking the Taylor Soule slot at forward. She never got into a rhythm there...maybe wrong offense for her?