This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I think it spells trouble. by BeastOfBourbon

I think it means he believes it was his clever scheming (inspired by the Great and Powerful Brian Kelly, of course) that got Jayden Daniels "out in space" so that he could make "explosive plays." No. That was all about an incredibly talented player using his considerable gifts to make something out of nothing whenever those spread principles turned to shit. As far as I know, Jayden Daniels isn't walking through that door at Notre Dame. So I fear we're just going to be looking at the same disjointed, grab bag nonsense that we've endured since Kelly arrived. That is the issue here.

(And please don't start on Denbrock's time at Cincinnati.)