This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Agree with this. by Brahms

If Freeman is expected to be CEO coach, he has no experience in that role and it will undoubtedly take some growing into. He also has limited experience as big-time DC and at a bright lights environment like ND; so that's another couple of roles to grow into. Then there is the limited peer / protoge network (which you note); but maybe the ND name helps there. We aren't a cesspool.

So while Freeman's character, energy, and reputation as tactician speak volumes, there are substantial OJT challenges. For these reasons, and despite the timing, he was not my #1 for the job.

I wish the guy well, however. Nice to have a guy who "gets it" at the helm. He clearly has the support of his coaching colleagues.