This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

Amazing that we would be a toss-up for an OL. by austindomer

Sure, there are always other considerations such as geography and family ties, but with the kind of offensive lines we’ve had in the last few years you’d think recruits would be jumping into the boat.

Trouble with WR is more understandable given our history of problems in this area under Kelly. But that has never made much sense to me when one considers how much we pass. I guess it’s Across’s theory that Kelly’s dink-and-dunk passing game doesn’t excite the top prospects who want to reel in the big throws that make the ESPN highlight shows.