This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
No by nihilist in golf pants
Notre Dame football is about legendary accomplishments: championships, Heisman trophy wins, and since 1970 major bowl wins. Kelly has none of those. I didn't even mention the unprecedented sanctions on his watch.
The verdict is clear: Kelly is not good enough to build a team that can win two playoff games. He's never come close to winning one. He's topped out with a few big regular season/minor bowl wins in a decade at the helm of his program. Any decent coach in College Football can boast of a few big wins. Given ND's position in College Football, those results are not "success".
The next three years is unlikely to change the verdict.