This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
and those schools don't already possess such an advantage? by jt
this is basically professional sports for everyone except the athlete.
the time for Notre Dame to lead on this issue and keep this as an amateur sport was about 30 years ago. The cat is out of the bag. Certain schools in power conferences generate a ton of revenue, enjoy massive recruiting advantages, and have fantastic facilities (go look up what Auburn is building--a freaking recording studio and a flight simulator inside of it's football complex).
This is a big business. That's what has people's attention. This idea that some schools would gain some sort of advantage that they don't already have is silly.