This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
He had Claypool and Boykin in 2018. by NDMike2001
Last year he only had Claypool (the 11th receiver drafted) and he passed for 3K yards and 34 TDs.
90% of Jones's passes are being thrown to four future first round draft picks. And he's playing behind a mammoth offensive line.
I'm willing to bet that Jones has a career that looks more like McCarron and McElroy than a starting NFL quarterback.
But the argument isn't who is better. Jones is certainly the better passer and fit for Alabama/Sarkesian offense. But I have no doubt that Book would have put up monster numbers in that same offense.