This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
No way - I don't buy it. by NYC_Domer
Trevor Lawrence was better his freshman year than Ian is now (no offense to the elder Mr. Book). Amari Rodgers was better at 18 than Avery is at 21.
Give me a two-deep of five-star sophomores and juniors and reload that each year ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. (Oh wait, that's 'Bama!)
By your logic, BYU would then be competing at Alabama's level . It just ain't so.
Recruiting in the 8-10 range is NEVER better than recruiting in the 1-5 range IF (and it's a big IF) you can recruit in that 1-5 range consistently. As we've seen, doing it one year in a row doesn't help so much.