This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Even taking a fair question by KeoughCharles05
I think that society as a whole is better off putting 18-22 year olds on islands of college campuses, housed with each other, as opposed to housed with people who are statistically far more likely to be at-risk. Not all colleges are set up this way, but even in the urban campuses where students mostly live off campus, society is likely better off with them living there, with other young people, than with their parents.
If there are at-risk faculty, take special precautions. At-risk staff would need to be dealt with differently. Ultimately, the working-age population that can't safely return to work probably need to be put on disability.