Post Reply to Rock's House
This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
I was under the impression that Fr. Ted... by GeronimoRumplestiltskin
...reversed course on de-emphasis. Perhaps by 1958 and certainly by 1963, I believe it had become obvious to him that de-emphasis had done little for Notre Dame financially or spiritually, and/or he came to the realization that first-rate academics and first-rate football could co-exist on the same campus with the right leadership. That Monk decided to resurrect Hesburgh's error of de-emphasis (and, really, in first forcing out Lou's excellent recruiting director in 1990 and finally Lou in 1996, that's exactly what he did) still astonishes me.