This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

There are too many good young coaches out there. by RagingBull

For our sake, hopefully so. Pietramala did great at Hopkins for the first part of his tenure but I'm not sure he still has it.

It may be time for the new generation to take over the coaching carousel. I was blown away by Cornell and what Connor Buczek has done there. Your guy at RIT - Jake Coon - has achieved remarkable success. The job Eric Wolf has done at NJIT is crazy. The game is changing. The sport has spread so much, recruiting is insanely difficult.

As much as these retreads are interesting there's just a lot of good young coaches I'd look at.