I think the Mitchell Report is looked at as less credible
by tdiddy07 (2024-01-24 13:18:00)

In reply to: I was reading John Heyman's column in the NY Post this  posted by G.K.Chesterton


than evidence produced during law enforcement investigations or early official positive MLB tests/suspensions. Also, the more vociferously PED use was denied (including in front of Congress or while denigrating those who truthfully reported of their use) the more that is held against the player. The Report is probably mostly right, but the investigative process left some room for doubt when pinpointing particular individuals.