I think it's justifiable either way.

I think it's justifiable either way.
by ndroman21 (2017-05-21 10:56:44)
Edited on 2017-05-21 10:58:10

In reply to: Nope posted by Wcnitz

He still had position and one could argue that he wanted to shield the defender from the ball. He wasn't given a chance to get back to the ball because the defender took him down.

That being said, I agree that he lacked intent once he went clear.

Replies:

Not a penalty, but could justifiably be called. * - NDMike2001 2017-05-21 12:34:19