Your second point, I agree with.

Your second point, I agree with.
by mocopdx (2023-03-07 16:15:25)
Edited on 2023-03-07 16:15:58

In reply to: Please reread my post where I said it should be shared posted by krudler

Your first point, the caveat of "more broadly" doesn't work for me.

It is a horrible thing that it was shared in this manner. A leader of Congress disseminating private information to a propaganda media org that is in bed with his party, allowing them to control the narrative and mislead the public as they please? I would say McCarthy should be embarrassed, but I can't imagine he has any shame left.

Replies:

Yes, it should be shared more broadly, but the selective - krudler 2023-03-07 16:18:13
- I really would like you to - ufl 2023-03-07 16:23:18
  - "I have seen the classified intel reports, and there is a - krudler 2023-03-07 18:10:34
    - On the trump issue the only reason we even knew the search - wpkirish 2023-03-07 19:54:58
    - I'm sorry...he? - ufl 2023-03-07 18:32:34
      - He being Schiff. I don't disagree with you that selectively - krudler 2023-03-07 18:38:40
        What McCarthy actually said - Jvan 2023-03-08 12:44:11
        Do you have a link to that? - ufl 2023-03-08 13:08:11
        Yes, from Forbes (link provided) - Jvan 2023-03-08 15:55:36
        Thanks - ufl 2023-03-09 09:03:09
        Guardian says he agreed to release the video to gain votes - wpkirish 2023-03-08 08:36:12
        “I heard this was a FOIA request”. Do you have a source for - enduff 2023-03-07 21:49:20
        Just so I've got this right - ufl 2023-03-07 18:44:23