F'em! Take him off anyway. TX, AL will back them up, right?
by beatgoeson (2024-03-04 12:35:43)

In reply to: SCOTUS rules Trump can appear on Presidential ballot  posted by DBCooper


And why not? Ignoring the supreme court has become acceptable. A long sorting-things-out line would begin with the initial violators in Alabama and Texas. No rules any more, and even a Supreme Court recusal, in a conflict of interest situation seems like a black-robe version of ignoring a disagreeable decision, doesn't it.

"Texas governor ignores Supreme Court ruling, adds more razor wire..." "Alabama Is Defying the Supreme Court on Voting Rights"

If it absolutely must come to including suspected insurrectionists , add Trump later as a write-in option. Not fair? I suppose it could be straightened out in time maybe 2025, and don'e through our court system, though it moves slowly, people say. Seems to be an accepted approach it. Delay,delay,delay: our theme of the day.




Replies: