I read that and did not really disagree until I heard a
by wpkirish (2024-03-01 09:59:15)

In reply to: I suggest reading the link above ndsapper posted *  posted by jt

Cannot Reply Return to Political

commentator last night discussng the idea in my post above.

The Court used its power to skip the Appellate Court under a procedure for cases "such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require im-
mediate determination in this Court.".

The most recent two examples are the Student Loan Forgiveess and Eviction Moratorium cases. Do you think the immunity decision is any less public importance than those? I obviously do not.

I have not reached the point of thinking the Court did this to help Trump but it is hard to see a justification for the different decisions.

Replies: