When they have been sufficiently addressed, yes. *
by BigBadBrewer (2024-02-28 21:29:18)

In reply to: So SCOTUS should ignore important questions? *  posted by airborneirish

Cannot Reply Return to Political

This user did not provide content for this post

There are two possible reasons why they took the case
by wpkirish  (2024-02-29 09:25:52)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

1. They took the case because they think it is important they affirm the appellate court decision before the trial in order to remove the abilty of Trump to argue it is going to be overturned on appeal. I think affirming the appellate court would do the same but they may feel differently.

2. The thing the appellate court ruled incorrectly and intend to overturn the decisoin and give Trump the get out of free card he seeks.

I guess there is a third possibility which would be they are delaying it to avoid the trial happening before the election which is essentially a win for Trump. If they uphold the appellate court decision without signiifciant changes, granting cert will have been a mistake in my opinion.
Immunity is also a claim in the classified docs case. *
by Kbyrnes  (2024-02-29 15:30:13)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Seems like it was already likely that one would not go to
by wpkirish  (2024-02-29 19:26:39)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

trial before the election.