You make a good point, but we are really the norm, not the
by sprack (2014-12-05 17:04:12)
Edited on 2014-12-05 17:27:00
[ Delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Rock's House ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

  In reply to: Faust, Davie, TW, and CW are all obvious disadvantages...  posted by Scoop80



exception on that.

Every historically elite program has had the same situation where they've had 3, maybe 4 truly great coaches in their history and the rest have either been dogs (often multiples in a row) or have been very good but never got to great, often because they just couldn't win the Big Game (John Cooper comes to mind as the poster boy). That they've had 3 or 4 is often why they got to elite in the first place. (Incidentally, there are a few programs who have really only had 1 truly great coach, and/or one or two who stayed for a very long time). If anyone can name a program with as many as 5, please do.

There are a lot of bad coaches and a lot of very good coaches, but there just plain aren't many truly great coaches out there, and there never has been.

And a truly great coach, assuming proper administrative support, can make almost any team great. A stark example is Bill Snyder at K-State. Before him they were terrible, when he left they were better but slipped back to the pack and almost to mediocrity, and when they got him back they became a national contender again.

Just pointing it out not as an excuse having anything to do with our present situation or Bruno95's very worthy question which I think he answered very well himself, but just what is historic reality for just about all programs.



Replies:

The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.