There is no need for this edifice. None.
by ACross (2024-04-18 20:58:36)

In reply to: Ok, coming back to this finally.  posted by Grace91

Post Reply Return to Rock's House

It is a net negative for the players and the football team. It takes them away from campus and their classmates for another hour or two per day. As grace said below, it might be best for non alums to sit this discussion out.

It is clearer why Swarbrick is hanging around like the smell of bad cologne at an Zahm SYR. Watch for him Don Kinging it at the announcement with his Montgomery Burns visage at the annoucement. It is not out of the question for part of it to be named after that useless douche.

I will happily sit this one out
by jt  (2024-04-19 09:56:12)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

after pointing out that ND seems to be indicating that it isn't very important to them (the administration, the program, whomever you want to define as "them") that the players spend time around their classmates at all.

I might add that a great many of "them" appear to be alumni.