Too many teams. First thing I noticed was that Syracuse's

Too many teams. First thing I noticed was that Syracuse's
by VaDblDmr (2024-04-04 11:47:21)

In reply to: [The Athletic] Inside the college football ‘Super League’ posted by wiNDycityfan

president was part of this (along with Gee). Second thing is that revenue would not be evenly distributed. IMO, including haves with have-nots is how we got to where we are right now.
No doubt there are good ideas here, but it will end up being fewer teams than 70 and won't include a Syracuse, for example. That's why the B1G and SEC won't touch this.
I believe the answer is for the networks to directly pay players and take that money out of the money going to the conferences. Or I suppose you could have the conferences pay the players. But either way it needs to not be the individual schools.

Replies:

If you take the schools out of the equation - Irish Warrior 2024-04-04 19:48:08
- No, I'm referring to payment. The student athletes should be - VaDblDmr 2024-04-04 20:21:32