You are getting blinded by a record and concluding that he must be a great coach. Its how we ended up with kelly.
And for the last time, this does not mean that I think Fitz is a better coach than Cutcliffe, it means that there is more evidence based on the criteria listed, that he would succeed. And by that criteria, I don't believe EITHER of them is a good candidate.
you guys are getting lost in the woods here, arguing over C and C- candidates. The point of the post is that we shouldn't hire either of them